BOYCOTT: THE MOST POWERFUL SOCIAL WEAPON (1) [Biafra Revolution]
The verb 'Boycott' never existed until a land agent who
was somewhat monstrous, hostile and one who perpetuated injustice to tenants
was ostracized.
Charles Cunningham Boycott (12/03/1832 – 19/06/1897), a
British citizen and a retired Army personnel, a farmer and later a land agent
for Lord Erne's estate. His duty as a land agent includes leasing land to
tenants for farming, collecting rents and supervising activities ongoing in the
estate. He believes excessively to please and execute his master's command and
that the feeling and wish of the people mattered less or probably didn't matter
at all.
In my words, Boycott was strict or should I say cruel. He
could evict a tenant even after rent has been paid. The worst scenario, a
tenant who unknowingly leaves the estate's gate open or one who's hen
trespasses to Boycott's property would have to pay a fine.
A certain time, the tenants were due to pay their rents.
Boycott has resolved to reducing 10% of the rent due to the poor harvest, but
all except two of his tenants rejected the 10% and insisted on a 25% reduction.
Boycott told them that he has written to his master (Lord Erne) and he has
refused the 25% discount. Subsequently, he issued demands for the outstanding
rents, and obtained eviction notices against eleven tenants.
The tenant farmers to resist Boycott's eviction and to
fight against injustice had formed associations. The most formidable
association amongst others was the Irish National Land League formed by Michael
Davitt and led by Charles Stewart Parnell.
The associations in their campaign for Land reform and
against injustice demanded for Three Fs;
1. Fair rent — meaning rent control: for the first time
in the United Kingdom, fair rent would be decided by land courts, and not by
the landlords;
2. Free sale — meaning a tenant could sell the interest
in his holding to an incoming tenant without landlord interference;
3. Fixity of tenure — meaning that a tenant could not be
evicted if he had paid the rent.
The leader of the Land League; Parnell, gave a speech
while addressing the members of the League in their multitude, he asked;
"What do you do with a tenant who bids for a farm from which his neighbour
has been evicted?" The crowd responded, "kill him," "shoot
him.
Parnell however suggest a contrary strategy which he
described as more Christian and charitable. His strategy was somewhat better as
it at least gave the victim chances of repentance. He advised that when a man
takes farm from which another has been unjustly evicted, the man should be
isolated. "When a man takes a farm from which another has been evicted,
you must shun him on the roadside when you meet him – you must shun him in the
streets of the town – you must shun him in the shop – you must shun him on the
fair green and in the market place, and even in the place of worship, by
leaving him alone, by putting him in moral Coventry, by isolating him from the
rest of the country, as if he were the leper of old – you must show him your
detestation of the crime he committed." Parnell said.
Unfortunately, Parnell's strategy wasn't executed on one
who rented a land where another has been unjustly evicted, probably no one
dared taking land that another tenant had been evicted from. The strategy had
to be executed on the very cruel Land Agent; Charles Cunningham Boycott.
Boycott had, after disagreeing on the 25% demand made by
the tenants, sent a 'process server' and a seventeen men escort of the police
force, to serve eviction notice to the tenants.
The 'process server' successfully delivered notices to
three of the tenants, but a fourth, Mrs Fitzmorris, refused to accept the
notice and began waving a red flag to alert other tenants that the notices were
being served. The women of the area descended on the process server and the
constabulary, and began throwing stones, mud, and manure at them, succeeding in
driving them away.
The crowd of tenants descended on the residence the
'process server' was seeking refuge and advised all Boycott's employees to stop
working for him. The advice was accompanied with disastrous threats that left
the employees with no other choice than quitting their jobs.
Within days, Boycott's employees have deserted him. His
blacksmith, postman, laundress and all other employees has voluntarily or maybe
fearfully stop working for him, leaving him alone to run the estate. His nephew
volunteered to be his postman but soon quit after threats.
Boycott was alone, the shopkeeper around him as a result
of warnings refused serving him. Boycott had to import foods and provisions.
Even the telegraph messenger stopped their services as it wasn't safe. The
tenants used and abused the farm with impunity.
Helpless Boycott was compelled to write to 'The Times'
and narrated his ordeal. It took the intervention of Britain before Boycott's
farm's produce was harvested. Boycott due to the social ostracism, was
compelled to travel out of the country with his family. In fact, the Carriage
hired for the trip was driverless, no one agreed to drive Boycott, an army officer
had to drive. The hotel Boycott initially stopped to rest and probably spend
some weeks received threats from the Land League members and they had to ask
Boycott to leave sooner.
He was completely ostracized by all!
The leaders of the League were charged to court and at
the end were victorious. The Three Fs demands was subsequently signed and
implemented. Can you now perceive the power of boycotting?
The word ' Boycott ' was afterwards adopted from Charles
Cunningham Boycott's name as description to the actions of the league members.
After Charles Cunningham Boycott was successfully
boycotted, more individuals, and groups has been able to boycott to show
displeasure, and hate for injustice.
• Americans boycotted British goods during America
Revolution.
America at last won their independence.
Read more.... bit.ly/2vgz9Ge
• Indians Boycotted British Goods, Education, and
Services during the Swadeshi Movement.
The Swadeshi movement, part of the Indian independence
movement and the developing Indian nationalism, was an economic strategy aimed
at removing the British Empire from power and improving economic conditions in
India by following the principles of Swadeshi and which had some success.
Strategies of the Swadeshi movement involved boycotting British products and
the revival of domestic products and production processes.
These series of boycott led India to become independent
politically, economically and militarily. Read more about it here... bit.ly/2AJRqRM
• Chinese boycotted American products to protest the
extension of the Chinese Exclusion Act.
"Chinese boycott of 1905."
The Chinese Boycott of 1905 was a large-scale boycott of
American goods in China that began on 10 May 1905 in reaction to a string of anti-Chinese
events in the United States.
The boycott originated when the Chinese Consolidated
Benevolent Association of San Francisco called upon the people of China to
pressure the United States into treating the Chinese immigrants in America
better.
This boycott ended the incessant abuse and raid in China
town, USA.
Read more... bit.ly/2OLjl6z
• Chinese boycotted Japanese products during the May
Fourth Movement.
Read more... bit.ly/2M4yIsn
I could go on and on listing historical but highly
efficient boycotts. This boycotts often times was worth it. So, tell me why
Biafrans shouldn't boycott Nigeria's elections and more? Who says boycott
doesn't pay?
Nigeria has shown all form of marginalization, and
injustice against Biafrans, even worse than what Boycott did to tenants yet
some persons keep shouting go get your PVC, as if PVC would solve the problem.
Seriously, what's wrong with this people?
To be continued!
Written by:
Precious Chibuike Anya
(TBRV Analyst)
For: The Biafra Restoration Voice -TBRV
Like our Facebook Page: The Biafra Restoration Voice -
TBRV
Join our Facebook Group:
The Biafra Restoration Voice (TBRV)
Follow us on:
Twitter: @TBRVorg
Instagram: @tbrvglobal
Email: tbrv.org@gmail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.